Get Your Free Restaurant HR Compliance Assessment

Senior specialists review your operation — Wage & Hour, Tip Credit, I-9, and multi-state payroll — and deliver findings in 48 hours. No obligation.

Or call directly:

+1 (203) 675-6796 English

+1 (757) 652-6662 Español

Available same day for active DOL or ICE situations

30+

Years

Exclusive Restaurant HR Experience

500+

Restaurants

Protected Across the U.S.

$20M+

In Potential Fines

Avoided for Our Clients

50+

Restaurant Chains

Served Nationwide

100+

DOL & ICE

Cases Managed

✓ 48-hour findings — specific violations, not generic recommendations

✓ Senior specialists only — not software, not generalists

✓ Restaurant chains exclusively — 3 to 500+ locations

What MYHRCD Has Delivered for Restaurant Chains

These are real outcomes from restaurant operators who engaged MYHRCD before — or immediately after — a DOL enforcement event began.

Mexicali · 9 locations

DOL investigator arrived unannounced and requested three years of payroll records, tip pool documentation, and manager compensation data across all locations.

~$3.6M

potential exposure
across all 9 locations

What myHRCD did

Restructured payroll — eliminated approximations, matched POS to payroll records

Established legally compliant tip pool across all locations

Delivered all required written notices to every employee

Managed investigator relationship and produced all documents in real time at the DOL hearing

in penalties or additional cost to the company

Clean DOL final report

No follow-up monitoring required

All 9 locations protected

Plaza Azteca · 65+ locations

Single manager error triggered a DOL complaint. Investigator responded and immediately requested a list of all company locations — 65+ sites at risk of full chain-wide audit.

65+

locations at risk of
chain-wide audit

What myHRCD did

Engaged DOL investigator immediately — contained scope to the specific incident

Resolved situation directly with the employee, with her authorization through the DOL

Presented documentation proving company-level protocols existed

Demonstrated correction accepted by the employee to close the investigation

in penalties or additional cost to the company

No chain-wide audit opened

Employee returned to work normally

All 65+ locations protected

In both cases, the outcome depended on one thing: expert intervention before the investigation expanded.